LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 104
0 members and 104 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-29-2004, 10:14 PM   #3329
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Scary Hilary Quote

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Here's a shorter summary from DeLong, from a post about ten days ago:
  • George W. Bush, after 9/11, had a chance to take out insurance against a poorly-performing labor market--had a chance to set a significant employment-creating fiscal stimulus program in motion. Yet he decided not to do so: decided to say that he was proposing a "jobs program" while what he decided to do was another round of tax cuts for the rich--a round that had extraordinarily little in the employment-bang-per-deficit-buck department. This isn't hair splitting: this is the essence. Bush bet that the labor market would recover on its own, and no one would notice that his deficit-boosting "jobs program" was weak tea in the context of the large shortfall in employment growth. He was wrong: we lost.
but tax cuts taste good. mmmmm tax cuts......
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:59 PM.