LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 116
0 members and 116 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-30-2004, 06:53 PM   #3399
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Scary Hilary Quote

Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
And this differs from administering social security (as it is now, not with individual accounts) how? No one pays for anything themselves there, either.

See also growing concerns re: fund-level fees for 401(k) plans, which are individual account plans. The fees are "invisible" so no one notices. They just reduce returns by a LOT in the aggregate in the long run.
The cost savings in hospitals I doubt has to do with pure admin. It has to do with waste, overbilling, etc. If you're talking pure admin, which we are for SS, figure out whether Ross Perot or the US gov't is likely to do it better and cheaper.

As for 401(k)s, sure there are invisible fees. But I'm more hopeful of their visibility than the hidden costs taxpayers bear of administering a retirement system.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51 AM.