LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 102
0 members and 102 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-30-2004, 08:38 PM   #3416
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Scary Hilary Quote

Quote:
Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Burger, you are schizo on this issue. You say the above, but you suggest that private industry will do this more cheaply. How? Your own data suggests that is extremely unlikely, especially given that there needs also to be a profit margin built in.

And even if privatization saves the gov't half -- and how likely is a reduction to 1% TOTAL for admin costs and profit? -- we've saved a whopping $4.5 billion. Woo-de-fucking-hoo.

On the other hand, that leaves Club with only $653 billion more "pork" to cut, so.....
JFC to you too. The cc comment was a fucking joke, people. And it's an entirely different system.

That said, there are two separate points here:

1) SS admin doesn't provide for much cost savings for club's $800B spending cut (other than benefits).

2) Despite that, putting that admin in the private sector could still be cheaper.

Why do people assume that corruption, waste, fraud, and abuse infects only the private sector? If that's the case, though, I'm sure we can create some savings by eliminating every inspector general's office.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16 PM.