LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 115
0 members and 115 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-30-2004, 08:54 PM   #3418
Secret_Agent_Man
Classified
 
Secret_Agent_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: You Never Know . . .
Posts: 4,266
Scary Hilary Quote

Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
Most of the cuts would come from non-defense discretionary spending, of course. . . . But I would also propose changes in the ADMINISTRATION of these programs, because I am certain there is an obsene amout of money being wasted in the beauracracy that is administering them.
RT has probably already hit you on this -- but you are living in a fantasy world.

For example, Medicare's admin/overhead costs are consistently at or below 1% of the total claims submitted. That is vastly better than ANY private insurer. So go ahead, cut that "waste."

When faced with reality -- you would be forced (if you are an honest man truly concerned with the fiscal well-being of the country) to support tax increases of one kind of another -- as did Bush 41. Then the unprincipled demagogues and/or ignoramuses on both sides of the aisle would crucify you for doing the right thing -- as they did with Bush 41.

S_A_M
__________________
"Courage is the price that life extracts for granting peace."

Voted Second Most Helpful Poster on the Politics Board.
Secret_Agent_Man is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:03 PM.