LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 95
0 members and 95 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-02-2004, 11:58 PM   #3589
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
At least one conservative is troubled by the report that the administration decided, for political reasons, not to try to take out Zarqawi and the Ansar al-Islam camp in northern Iraq before the war started: Jacob Levy has been blogging about it at the Volokh Conspiracy. He has been unable to nail down or pull apart the story, but after much looking says that he thinks NBC's initial story is closer to the truth than a Robert Novak (!) story trying to discredit it.
Since I'm drunk and all, maybe this question won't make any sense, but Bush was supposed to ignore all the other CIA stuff about chemical and nuclear weapons, right? So how come he should have listened to this stuff?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 07-03-2004 at 12:30 AM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19 AM.