Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
They weren't at their workplace
|
I didn't say they were. I used that as an example of a content-based restriction that is constitutional. You asked for a content-based restriction that is constitutional and I gave you one.
Whether the government can engage in content-based restrictions or not in publicly owned forums depends on whether the forum is considered a public or non-public forum. In your analysis in previous posts, you took the position that the government can never engage in content-based restrictions. I remarked that your analysis was not taking into account the public vs. non-public forum distinction.
It is my understanding that content-based restrictions in public forums are subject to strict scrutiny and in non-public forums are subject to a rationale relationship test. Read the cases if you want to know more.
