Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Nevertheless, as he clearly never intended to be an unbiased fact finder (for all of the reasons I've previously stated), but for his wife's connections, he would never have been considered for the job.
|
"Clearly". Basic rule of written advocacy is that the better your argument, the fewer adjectives and adverbs required.
On this one, you are sitting on the tree limb baying at the Moon.
P.S. What in Wilson's report was WRONG? or SLANTED? In order to give your position any credibility, you'll at least have to identify _something_. Does the CIA or White House now disagree with Wilson's assessment in any meaningful way?
S_A_M
