|
Let's go back to the Trees
Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
"Clearly". Basic rule of written advocacy is that the better your argument, the fewer adjectives and adverbs required.
On this one, you are sitting on the tree limb baying at the Moon.
P.S. What in Wilson's report was WRONG? or SLANTED? In order to give your position any credibility, you'll at least have to identify _something_. Does the CIA or White House now disagree with Wilson's assessment in any meaningful way?
S_A_M
|
I think the White House has adopted the position that anyone who questions or disagrees with administration policy is biased, at best, and possibly treasonous.
__________________
"More than two decades later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming out any other way."
|
