LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 123
0 members and 123 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-15-2004, 09:38 PM   #4780
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
Taj Mahal No More

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Club's not a litigator, and is therefore having a little difficulty in imagining the potential drawbacks of allowing elected state court judges to rule on matters of federal constitutional law.

Living in S.F., you'd think he's be a strong proponent of having such matters heard exclusively by men and women appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate.

Club --- if this passes, I'll meet you in Department 302. We have a lot of wealth redistribution to catch up on.
To be clear, I do not support this move, I was just musing that I can understand the motives for it.

Department 302? Is that a court room or something? I don't like those. The judge is always so mean, especially when he says to you, "the defendant will rise to hear the jury's verdict."
sgtclub is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 PM.