LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 102
0 members and 102 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-15-2004, 10:05 PM   #4784
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Taj Mahal No More

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
:eek2:

I would really hate to be the counsel on the committee that has to say to his member, with a straight face, that the law is constitutional and consistent with our system of checks and balances. A statute that allows Congress to overrule a judicial decision? It didn't even work with the executive. cough, Chadha, cough.

What's next--every bill comes along with jurisdiction-stripping language tacked on to prevent its challenge in court?

[hint, atticus, that's rhetorical, please don't find such a proposal on google[
no need to google. Call Gephardt's staff. He figured a way to overeturn SCt. decisions with an executive order. I think its take a writ of hocus pocus, or something.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16 PM.