Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
One more. I can't resist.
If you are raised in Philadelphia to know nothing of the Koran and believe that Muslims believe that life's sole purpose is extermination of infidels, it's hard to make a case that they're not animals. You will think their value to the planet is several grades below the cattle grazing outside.
|
Oh, bite me. Keep sucking off Gattigap. If you suck hard enough, he'll tell you you your foreign policy knowledge is so amazing you ought to get an ambassadorship.
Gattigap - Its half and half. I read the opinions of most of the idiots on this board who generally get their politics from either the left or right plank and decide to post something nuts. But then, in the midst of a rant, I start thinking "Fuck, that ain't a bad point..." and wind up including something sensible and insightful. So I'd say my shit here is half and half. Usually I intend to piss off the idiots here who sound like Bob herbert or Frank Rich soundalikes, but then I wind up sounding like Ann Coulter.
Now, back to Ty... I did not say ALL Muslims' sole purpose was to rid the world of infidels. I said that "radical" Islam's purpose. I'm glad I carefully inserted "radical" - it really worked well. And I thought I had bad reading comprehension. Now, if you omitted "radical" on purpose, which I don't think you'd do because you're obviously smarter than that (even if you do get a load of your politics from some shitass liberal sources... my guess is, you actually took your poli-geo professor in college seriously), please bag the cheap technique. You don't need it.
I'm nearly ready to cancel my WSJ and NYTimes subscription, not because I have a problem with biased opeds and reporting, but because the plank-following is so fucking pathetic. The only guy who seems to blend the left and right a little bit is safire, and he's lost all credibility in my book for his continued belief that WMD will be found.
