LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 133
0 members and 133 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-28-2004, 01:26 PM   #515
Replaced_Texan
Random Syndicate (admin)
 
Replaced_Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,281
Funny

Quote:
Originally posted by Gattigap
I thought the issue was that by refusing federal funding, it effectively shuts down scientific research in the area, because basic research is systemically dependent upon the presence of such funding, at least in part. My understanding was that if there's no federal involvement, it just doesn't happen. This ain't NPR, where you can easily cover the problem by selling more bookbags and coffee cups.
Basically, you have to get private funding and set up a separate institute that doesn't get federal funds. I understand that Harvard has set up a Harvard Stem Cell Institute to try and work around the problem. Of course, the irony is that without federal funding, Institutional Review Board oversight of the research is not mandated for the research to go forward. I would rather have the research go on in a federally funded institution with IRB oversight than some private lab, with no one looking into the ethics issues of experimenting on human subjects.

I know one researcher who flies to Brazil at least twice a month to conduct his research on coronary artery disease. His embryonic research here is with dogs, though he has a list of donors who would be happy to contribute to research here in the US.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
Replaced_Texan is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:58 AM.