LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 97
0 members and 97 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-28-2004, 04:49 PM   #586
Atticus Grinch
Hello, Dum-Dum.
 
Atticus Grinch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,117
The Analysis From a Dissident Catholic Democrat

Quote:
Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Can you give me a coherent, non-religious analysis of how to distinguish between a minor and an adult for purposes of laws against statutory rape and pedophilia? Do you think there is a non-religious basis for jailing practicing NAMBLA types?
Sure. Decades of observed developmental consequences of early sexual activity have shown that pre-pubescent sexual contact results in other negative social behaviors, such as depression, drug use, promiscuity, a tendency toward seeking sexual contact with a new generation of minors, etc. Take a poll of the sexual offenders, and you'll find that they were abused as kids.

As for statutory rape, I don't think the justification was ever religious. The laws against extramarital sex accomplish the same religious goals. But I would justify it today on the ground that 16-year-olds who have sex with 24-year-olds tend to become a burden on society by having children out of wedlock and dropping out of school. Oh, and the fact that we don't want 24-year-olds to get shot by angry parents of 16-year-olds, which is what would happen if statutory rape were decriminalized.
Atticus Grinch is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 AM.