LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 85
0 members and 85 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-28-2004, 05:22 PM   #11
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
Funny

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
your kidding, right? how is science unclear on this? I learned in 4th grade about conception and fetuses, etc.

The only thing science has not yet told us definitively is when a fetus is viable, which at least to some is a highly relevant point between conception and delivery.

The debate on balancing lives is a question of whether there should be a balancing of interests or not. Anti-abortion says not, except (perhaps) in the limited circumstances where either the fetus or the mother will die (hi, greedy!).

When I see folks in priest outfits holding up bottled fetuses, I do not see them carrying scientific evidence of life. I see them carrying an emotional appeal to a moral determination.
I'm not kidding. Viability is meaningless to me because it moves with science. A 7 month fetus "born" 50 years ago that was considered not viable, could be viable today after 4 months.
sgtclub is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:50 PM.