LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 104
0 members and 104 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-06-2004, 12:51 AM   #1325
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,084
Political Ad

Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
The bottom line was that he voted no on $ for troops at war. You and he can both contort all you like, but it's still a Ney.
The bottom line is that it was a dispute about how to pay for the war, not whether to pay for it. This is from an ABC News article that I found in about three seconds on Google:
  • On the Sept. 14, 2003, edition of CBS's Face the Nation, Kerry spoke at length about an amendment he and Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., were offering which would have paid for the $87 billion by delaying some of the recent tax cuts.

    Asked if he would vote against the $87 billion if his amendment did not pass, Kerry said, "I don't think any United States senator is going to abandon our troops and recklessly leave Iraq to whatever follows as a result of simply cutting and running. That's irresponsible."

    Kerry argued that his amendment offered a way to do it properly, "but I don't think anyone in the Congress is going to not give our troops ammunition, not give our troops the ability to be able to defend themselves. We're not going to cut and run and not do the job."

    Kerry spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter said her boss' vote against the funding was a "protest vote."

    At the time of the October 2003 vote, "The nation had four months before funds were needed but Republicans were hell-bent on moving this bill through as quickly as possible, before the tough questions could be asked and the president's failures would be discovered," Cutter said.

    Cutter went on to say the Bush White House had threatened to veto the entire $87 billion supplemental bill if the Kerry-Biden amendment had passed.

No one in their right mind would accuse the White House of failing to support the troops by making this threat.

Quote:
You kill me. The left have been BANGING the president relentlessly since 2003, but its the president slinging dirt. Are you that partisan these days that you can't see it? There is dirt on both sides, some true and some not. You have to be able to separate the shit out.
Did I not just say that there's dirt on both sides? Are you even reading my posts when you respond to them?
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar

Last edited by Tyrone Slothrop; 08-06-2004 at 12:57 AM..
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 AM.