|
Was Not Me Right?
Let's suppose, for the sake of argument, that there were WDM in Iraq, and that they they were smuggled out of the country to Syria (inter alia?) before/during/after the invasion. Does this not suggest that invading Iraq was a really stupid way of dealing with the problem of Iraqi WMD? Or perhaps that we should have been prosecuting the war in order to prevent this outcome -- i.e., to get control of WMD? I'm just wondering why an outfit as conservative as the Washington Times thinks that they are defending the Administration by floating this claptrap.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
