Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I was giving background on the USOC complaint and the Bush campaign's response. I pointed out that the USOC tends to be aggressive in copyright cases, and I could have cared less one way or another if it was a legally valid complaint/claim.
|
WTF are you talking about? What copyrights does the IOC own? As I explained before, copyrights protect literary works and works of art. What copyrights does the IOC own?
If you are talking about film footage of the events, as I explained before, the copyrights to that are owned by the entity that filmed it, which wasn't the IOC it was NBC (or CBS or whichever won the bidding).
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
The copyright issue, which I know nothing about and really don't care about, was tangential at best from the original post.
|
Yes, it is quite clear that you know nothing about intellectual property. Whether it was tangential or not was irrelevant to SHP's post. He claimed no one was talking about copyrights but me. I said not true, RT brought it up in her post. Then you said, No I didn't. Then I said, here is your post.
Who gives a flying fuck if it was tangential in your mind. It was talked about and that was the point I was addressing in response to SHP's (aka dummy) insipid post.
