LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 99
0 members and 99 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-14-2004, 01:24 PM   #4424
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
general pet peeve (comments from Chicagoans?)

Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
Please let me know if either of you take concrete steps to put this into law. I will want to sell my property well before then.

The question I have for all of you is who is going to make the determination as to who is permitted and not permitted to live where? And are you going to have compulsory acceptance of the vouchers? Seems to me you would have to in order for this to work. Also seems to me to be a taking, but as has been documented here before I'm no con law scholar.
The law already provides for, albeit ineffectively, compulsory acceptance of vouchers.* It's in the amendments to the Fair Housing Act. As to compulsory acceptance of vouchers constituting a "taking" under the Fifth Amendment (like the pun?), vouchers are a form of scrip, exchangeable for cash. In other words, they are compensation, the same as any other type of rent.

ETA at least in Chicago, where the City's ordinance on fair housing provides that governmental subsidies are not a permissible reason to deny a prospective tenant.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.

Last edited by taxwonk; 09-14-2004 at 01:47 PM..
taxwonk is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:56 AM.