LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 953
0 members and 953 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 05-30-2003, 04:36 PM   #163
ms. naughty diplomat
naughty but sweet
 
ms. naughty diplomat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: dramatically lowering my post per day average
Posts: 266
Lawyer Discipline

Quote:
Originally posted by andViolins
Article in the latest Scene Magazine:

What struck me about all of the clients who are complaining about lousy lawyers -- why does it appear that none of them sued the attorney for malpractice?
oh come on, mr. violins. we all know that since judges are all lawyers that suing the attorney for malpractice would be useless because the judges would all protect them. and not only that you would have to hire another attorney to help you and after being so traumatized by their last experience with an attorney that would just add needless pain and suffering to their already destroyed lives :eyeroll:

but seriously, i read the article and it seemed like the author had a particular bias in mind to make the disciplinary system look like it protects bad lawyers. however, since we all paid attention in legal ethics class in law school and of course remember all of those legal ethics rules :rofl: we know better. we know that unless you are doing something extreme like using proceeds from cocaine smuggling to bribe the judge to acquit your client that generally lawyers are allowed a second chance after a signle ethical violation. plus how would these nonattorneys and clients realize how bad it is to even get a public reprimand for an attorney.

ms. naughty diplomat
ms. naughty diplomat is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16 AM.