LawTalkers
Forums
User Name
Remember Me?
Password
Register
FAQ
Calendar
Go to Page...
» Site Navigation
»
Homepage
»
Forums
»
Forum
>
User CP
>
FAQ
»
Online Users: 3,943
0 members and 3,943 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
»
Search Forums
»
Advanced Search
Thread
:
Nutjobs Ranting About Politics.
View Single Post
09-16-2004, 12:06 PM
#
4668
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
More Flipper
Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
As you say, words have meaning. If they wanted something more they should have included it in the resolution. All the resolution requires is for him to "make available" his "determination," whatever that means.
Incidently, I'm sure you realize that this garbaly goop is not unusual in an exercise that needs to be carefully drafted in order to garner the necessary support. Happens all the time in the UN.
I disagree, but not worth arguing about. You advise someone to go make that argument and see how far it gets. Essentially it would be a Bush Lied argument.
No, but to say that he went outside of his authority you would have to argue he was unreasonable.
Are we talking about the Prudent Man standard? THat argument could and has been made.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by taxwonk
Powered by
vBadvanced
CMPS v3.0.1
All times are GMT -4. The time now is
08:10 PM
.
-- LawTalk Forums vBulletin 3 Style
-- vBulletin 2 Default
-- Ravio_Blue
-- Ravio_Orange
Contact Us
-
Lawtalkers
-
Top
Powered by:
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By:
URLJet.com