http://www.honestreporting.com/artic...Terrorists.asp
Reuters official admits the reason it doesn't call terrorists terrorists is that it is afraid to do so, incredible. Do you think the fear ever influences the "facts?"
The National Post in Toronto and The Calgary Herald, which both use Reuters dispatches -[decided] to substitute the word "terrorist" in articles for terms like "insurgents" and "rebels."
"Our editorial policy is that we don't use emotive words when labeling someone," said David A. Schlesinger, Reuters' global managing editor. "Any paper can change copy and do whatever they want. But if a paper wants to change our copy that way, we would be more comfortable if they remove the byline."
Mr. Schlesinger said he was concerned that changes like those made at CanWest could lead to "confusion" about what Reuters is reporting and possibly endanger its reporters in volatile areas or situations.
"My goal is to protect our reporters and protect our editorial integrity," he said.
According to Mr. Schlesinger, members of Reuters' sales staff in Canada have asked CanWest to remove writers' names to conform to its guidelines for the use of "terrorist." Reuters has also asked that CanWest add its name to that of Reuters as the source of revised articles and to display that information only at the end of the articles. Alternatively, Reuters suggests that its name not be used at all.
