Quote:
Originally posted by leagleaze
This person said he is the one who decided to focus on West (something I don't think particularly bothered any of us) and boil it down to the cursing (which is I believe the meat of the problem here.) You should also know he told me that he felt our reasons were childish and petty, which is why he chose to boil them down to cursing. Or at least that is how I interpreted what he said to me.
|
You should inform this jackass that if it was indeed his decision to focus the article on WEST and to characterize our leaving infirm as a reaction to a language filter, such a decision made his article simple, childish, petty and inaccurate (or incomplete to say the least). A response on our part asking him to paint a complete, fair and balanced picture of what actually happened hardly seems petty and childish. If it is, his concern about our views of his reporter's honesty (or lack thereof) seems similarly childish and petty.
TM
