LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 927
0 members and 927 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-05-2003, 03:19 PM   #165
ms. naughty diplomat
naughty but sweet
 
ms. naughty diplomat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: dramatically lowering my post per day average
Posts: 266
A clear sign

Quote:
Originally posted by andViolins
of the apocalypse

http://www.daytondailynews.com/life/...0604nosex.html

[spree: article about the rise of low-sex or no-sex marriages]
that is one weird article, mr. violins :eek2:

maybe the people involved in those marriages are all closested homosexuals

btw, wasn't refusing to have sexual intercourse with your spouse adequate grounds for annulment under common law?

ms. naughty diplomat

Last edited by ms. naughty diplomat; 06-05-2003 at 03:24 PM..
ms. naughty diplomat is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:33 AM.