Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield 0
Because that describes just about every single response, or non-response, the GOP and its adherents have offered in every fact-based debate here and elsewhere throughout this election run-up. Just.... change... the.... focus...
|
1. Rather has unproven, preconcieved notions about Bush's NG service;
2. He uses forged docs as his only evidence to go on national TV to make his case;
3. Repubs point out that the docs are . . . er . . . forgeries.
4. We've cravenly changed the focus.
--------------
1. Wilson says, Bush lied about that Niger stuff;
2. In his testimony concerning his "proof" of that assertion, it turns out, instead, that he's been lying to the public.
3. For pointing this out, we've cravenly changed the focus.
----------------------------
1. Ty and the rest of the Dem world (well, okay, maybe not Ty) claim that Bush lied to us all and said that SH was an imminent danger.
2. It's pointed out that, no, Bush said that we shouldn't wait for it to be an imminent danger.
3. By doing so, he cravenly changed the focus.
---------------
1. Kerry says, he has a plan.
2. Repubs say, what plan?
3. Kerry says, well, a secret plan.
4. We say, again, what plan. In doing so, we have cravenly changed the focus.
----------------------
1. The NYT claims, in P1 headlines, that Bush allowed huge weaponry to be looted while we watched.
2. Evidence shows, um, no, we weren't there yet.
3. You say, nothing's proven yet, and you make this claim?
4. By pointing out that, um, the Times went first and made this national news on incomplete evidence, we've cravenly changed the focus.
----------------------
A theme is developing.
