LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 749
0 members and 749 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-05-2003, 04:34 PM   #8491
evenodds
prodigal poster
 
evenodds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: gate 27
Posts: 2,710
Banning the babies

Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
I don't think she was being obtuse. It seemed like a passive-aggressive way of informing Str8 that if she couldn't bring the baby, she couldn't come at all, and she would just hate to miss it, all the more so in light of how little trouble the infant would be and how considerate the cousin would be.

Of course, she should just have said so, rather than write an email that forces Str8 to play the ogre.

Edited to add: Str8, I think it would be best for you to hire a babysitter for the reception, you will save yourself a lot of heartache and finger-wagging about proper etiquette, etc.
Since so many people hire sitters for receptions these days, I don't think she was being necessarily passive-agressive or rude. She probably just misread it. I have to endorse the separate room, sitter deal. I attended a wedding where I had no idea that there were children in attendance. They were neither seen nor heard.
evenodds is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:29 PM.