Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
You misrepresent the facts here in multiple material respects. I get tired of finding and linking to sources to correct you, only to have you disappear or change the subject, so this time I'm not going to bother.
|
That's cool, but, if you have time, PM SAM and explain that part of Wilson's "proof" that the claim was bogus was based on his analysis that "the documents" were forgeries, but it turns out, in his commission testimony, that (oops) he didn't even see any such docs until after Bush's speech, and that was the basis of his red-faced "must have got the timeline wrong" explanation.
