Quote:
	
	
		| Originally posted by andViolins You raise an interesting question about the lack of info on any of the regional Ohio boards.  However, I don't think the lack of information about firms is limited to Columbus or even Ohio.  For Columbus, why don't we have more chatter about Vorys or Shottenstein [even info about moving to their posh new digs in the arena district].  How about Cincinnati firms?  Other than whining about lack of parity with Columbus and Cleveland firms, there is silence about Dinsmore and FBT and GHR.  How about Toledo???  There has to be someone in cyberland with dirt about Shumaker or Eastman Smith or Sam Bolotin??????  As for Baker, I don't know squat.  Well, that's not quite true.  I do know that the Cleveland Building Trades were quite upset when Baker began to heavily market their HR/Labor consulting firm BakerER.  The Unions picketed outside the building on East 9th and even brought out one of their famous inflatable rats.
 | 
	
 well, obviously it is surprising how little information gets posted about other firms / markets.  certainally the la board is a prime example - gigantic legal market, lots of firms that are big enough that outing should be a pretty low risk, and they even allowed anon. posting - but no info was there.  half the time when i scrolled down on the old board it was the same poster under various sock names talking about the la office of squire sanders.
obviously boards like the ohio, midwest, south, and detroit ones are at a major disadvantage than the bigger markets because a lot of the firms are smaller so that it is more difficult to find people who have info and are not afraid that it would be outable if posted.   still, fear of outing can't be totally to blame - back when i used to read the ny board, there was hardly any info posted about prosakeur whose new york office has over 400 attorneys - certainally not the amount of info you'd expect about a firm of that size.  so in many respects it is not surprising that jones day and squire have more info about them than the other ohio firms.   they are larger and more prominent - and jones day has been pretty active on the merger front recently.
still, there are a lot of firms in ohio with more than 100 attorneys (you listed some of them - also porter wright, buckingham, roetzel, califee, the larger cincinatti firms) that there has been almost nothing about.  maybe a law student might ask a question about one of them and a lot of the time there would be no answer.  i don't know if people are more concerned giving the smaller legal community and smaller firms about outing than on the coasts.  or if there is more apathy in the patch.   what's even weirder is that some nothing town outside of columbus (new rome) has gotten almost as much press on these boards as columbus itself.  maybe columbus needs to have its own thong to generate discussion.
incidentially, do you have any pictures of the giant rats or the union guys out protesting in front of baker's offices?
ms. naughty diplomat