LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 143
0 members and 143 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 12-21-2004, 03:10 PM   #2023
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Bleeding Kansas.

Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Do you think I'll get contempt if I write the following brief:

"Red blanket cat soap phone monkey bar Lou Reed and the Velvets Lucy in the Sky pie eye hello hey now my baby don't shake it like she used to mountain top candy carved melotrone sverethelementment, Inc. Cazart! Amen. Hallelujah.

I could argue the above with just as much effectiveness to this Court as any of the well reasoned arguments made in the past several months. Either as a result of activist bent or sheer inability to understand the statute at issue, it is clear this Court will not follow the law."

I am considering whether to argue gibberish to the Court in my next appearance. You think that will get me thrown in the clink? I am arguing before a political hack with brain the size of a walnut. The man's an utter imbecile.
Check his bio. Where did he grow up?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:01 AM.