LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 3,516
0 members and 3,516 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-07-2005, 01:52 PM   #1150
bilmore
Too Good For Post Numbers
 
bilmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Correct me if I'm wrong, but your "post with a bunch of stuff about Nelson" had nothing damning in it. Unless you think it's damning that some lefties have cited -- you seem to be ducking that point because it's a little too stupid. Hence my crack about the phone book. You started out by saying that Nelson was inaccurate and biased, but you've shown nothing on either score.
I'll try this one last time.

You quote Nelson, who, using only those mysterious nameless sources, tells us that Bush doesn't even allow anyone to tell him bad news. You vouch for Nelson.

I say, wait, Nelson is not the paragon of unbiased and stunningly accurate information that you seem to imply - he is the darling of the liberal blogs, he pretty much just says things that are very critical of Bush, and he's not known for stunning insight. Josh calls him "our friend." I mention "implode".

You say, wait, none of those things exist on gooooogle. And I can't find any link to "Nelson Report" and "implode".

I say, wait, try "google", instead, 'cuz here's a bunch of those entries. Oh, and here's the post about "implode".

Sidd, insightful as always, says "oh, so he inaccurately forecast a rate hike? Boy, Bilmore, what a dummy you are."

You say I've found nothing damning about Nelson. You've misconstrued my thrust. I was damning your vouching for unattributed garbage.
bilmore is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 PM.