Sorry, I guess I have heard of them, although the idea that a test prep company would be in a good position to rate law school faculties is a bit mystefying.
No I didn't go to BC. And if it helps soften the blow, I didn't intend the comment about people not knowing their faculty as some sort of "my school's got a better faculty than yours" sort of thing -- my point was that the question just doesn't matter. When I (or anyone else I know) is interviewing someone for a law firm job the reputation of the candidate's law school faculty is utterly inconsequential. The school makes a difference because I figure it has an impact on how much the candidate has been challenged; the candidate's grades make a difference; it might mean something to me if I actually happen to know one of the person's professors. But I simply don't know and don't care about some amorphous "faculty reputation," and I think you would have to search for a long time to find someone involved in hiring who does.
That doesn't mean the ratings are meaningless. If accurate, they might reflect something about what the quality of your LS experience would be like, or about how hard you will have to work to learn, etc., etc. But the original question was which school was more likely to get you a job.
