Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I was pleased to see this post at first. You have taken a step forward by posting a link to the content you will rely on for your post. One can then see the source due to your attribution. Also, if you continue using the links rather than your standard massive copying you will reduce the incident of carpal tunnel amongst us.
However, Your normal posts have the intriguing included commentary style, so while reading a presumed People story we'll come across your commentary- no break included so we all know to read carefully, but still your commentary is clear from the rest of the news item. We all can take away what you intended from your post: e.g. Brittney is pregnant and you don't think much of her husband etc.
But here, with this post, you drop the commentary- all you leave is the egnimatic hint over the link. I know you intend to question something relative to my post here and offer my Politics post as damning evidence, but I really don't see how you feel the two contradict each other. I really would suggest you continue to include the commentary.
|
Because I really don't think you get it, and just for future reference, yesterday was not Tuesday.
