LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 239
0 members and 239 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 05-16-2005, 07:57 PM   #4108
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
California Schools don't have enough money?

Quote:
Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
I love it when Republicans try math.

Of course, if you decide that you don't want a 35:1 teacher/student ratio the numbers change quickly. Likewise, this sounds like high-school, so you may want a lab (more per square foot and more square footage per student), you may want a library, you may event want to have the ability to gather all your students in one place (say, an auditorium), you may want a few other activites to go on in the building (say, an art studio space).

It's amazing what you can do to costs if you assume away a good half of the building and cut your teaching staff by another 50%.

These kids aren't going to get taught French or go to Paris. They're going to be warehoused until they can make french fries.

(By the way, if I haven't been clear before, I'd be happy to dramatically cut admins and do some radical reshaping of schools -- but not like this. My goal would be to start with a 15:1 or better student/teacher ratio and figure out what we had to do to get there).
180 students. 5 teachers = 36 students per teacher.

Did we read the same essay? Did you miss the sarcasm? We shouldn't have to rent anything because the school districts already own the schools.
Spanky is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 PM.