LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 229
0 members and 229 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 05-16-2005, 08:05 PM   #4109
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
California Schools don't have enough money?

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
180 students. 5 teachers = 36 students per teacher.

Did we read the same essay? Did you miss the sarcasm? We shouldn't have to rent anything because the school districts already own the schools.
THIRTY - SIX students per teacher. I'm sorry!

Yes, all the sarcasm is easy and cheap. A republican staple. This is like the business plans I get from entrepreneurs, where they just assume away until they have a billion dollar business, on paper, in five years.

Try this -- assume you want a 15:1 student teacher ratio and build from the bottom up. Factor in everything you need, including construction costs amortized via debt. It's not so easy.

I could poke holes in every number he proposes, but there's not the point. The big one is class size, and that's the one that most impacts education. (By the way, can you find any private schools that offer a high school education at $7,000 that you would recommend -- and they don't have those pesky unions).

Last edited by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy; 05-16-2005 at 08:08 PM..
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 PM.