LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 884
0 members and 884 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-28-2003, 11:01 AM   #29
Say_hello_for_me
Theo rests his case
 
Say_hello_for_me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: who's askin?
Posts: 1,632
retirement benefits redux 2003

So I read the retired managing partner's email and the press reports. His retirement benefits were stopped and he hopes to find a way to replace them?

That doesn't sound like a 401K to me, but I'm obviously just guessing here. If not, were retirees benefits being funded with income from ongoing operations? Were partners still drawing after retiring?

If so, then fuck him and the horse he rode in on. These firms will all die some day. From our view, it is supposedly one of the reasons that Pennie & Edmonds can't find a groom (emphasis on "one of").

So, if anyone can confirm whether retirees were still drawing from the pot after retirement, other than a standard government-sanctioned retirement plan, it would help many of us determine what lessen there is to learn from this.

Hello
__________________
Man, back in the day, you used to love getting flushed, you'd be all like 'Flush me J! Flush me!' And I'd be like 'Nawww'

Say_hello_for_me is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:21 AM.