|
GP= greedy partner
Who knows with the board of J&G, they are very very slow to react or deal with problems.
The impression that was left is that the additional issue was a malpractice/ethics issue not a sex harrasment issue, but it was not very clear, just that someone inside was talking to an outside counsel about it. The 'it" is a malpractice / ethics / breach of contract deal according to the GP and supposedly it has some legs and J&G may have some big exposure.
Last edited by Regional Anon; 06-29-2003 at 11:56 AM..
|