Quote:
Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
There is good 5'3" 100 lbs, and there is bad 5'3" 100 lbs. I have dated the former, and her frame was tiny. She didn't look underweight at all, but she had never been naturally curvy. She was objectively hot.
Lindsay's frame is not tiny. She naturally has curves. She's not an inherently petite girl.
You are probably the former as well (proportionally - I don't know how tall you are). Two girls of the same height/weight can look drastically different based on their bone/muscle structure. I have a friend who is about the same height as me. Most people would agree that I look bigger than him. He outweighs me by 20 lbs.
|
Word.
There are some people who are just naturally slender (e.g., gwnc, Paris Hilton -- though I find her skanky-looking, it's not because she's too thin; Nicole Kidman; others I can't think of right now), and then there are those who starve themselves to a weight that is unnatural. I think the giveaway is when their heads look about three times too big for their bodies. (Nicole Ritchie, the new invisible LL, the skinny Olsen twin, overly skinny Renee Zellwhatever)
In the picture someone posted with LL in the black bikini, she didn't look freakish, but there's another picture floating around the 'net at some Cartier function where she's wearing a white dress, and she looks absolutely icky. Her elbows are too pointy and you can see her collarbone. Blech.
Found it (though there's one that's even worse).
