LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 129
1 members and 128 guests
Icky Thump
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-03-2005, 01:05 PM   #3982
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
From the Things I Did Not Need To Know About BS file

Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
Assuming that he pops right back up after deflating, is three 10-min fucks really that much different than a single half-hour fuck? I don't think so. Of course, this may be one example of how I have low, low standards.

If it was 3 10-min fucks spread over 24 hours, though, THAT's a problem.
Your inconsistency confounds me. Do you want 10 min sex or 30 min sex? Just two weeks ago, I got clocked for bragging about being able to fuck for extended periods of time. I believe the criticism was that such fucking was boring, and that, when you go that long, women "just want it to be over with." Now, if I understand your post, which its highly probable I don't (since 90% of what is posted by all posters here is subject to numerous meanings), you're claiming the ten minute fuck is not as good as the half hour fuck.

If I fucked you three times in one day, half an hour each time, there would be boredom and soreness issues. I'm not saying fucking three times a day for extended periods is bad. Even when its boring, sex beats, say, reading the paper or cleaning the cat litter. I'm only noting that half hour sex appears to be exactly the sort of sex you and some others said they didn't want last week.

Actually, I don't know what the hell I was saying... But I think I might have made a point. Or maybe not.

"It was the best of times, it was the 'blurst' of times?! Idiot monkeys!"
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 PM.