Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Your inconsistency confounds me. Do you want 10 min sex or 30 min sex? Just two weeks ago, I got clocked for bragging about being able to fuck for extended periods of time. I believe the criticism was that such fucking was boring, and that, when you go that long, women "just want it to be over with." Now, if I understand your post, which its highly probable I don't (since 90% of what is posted by all posters here is subject to numerous meanings), you're claiming the ten minute fuck is not as good as the half hour fuck.
If I fucked you three times in one day, half an hour each time, there would be boredom and soreness issues. I'm not saying fucking three times a day for extended periods is bad. Even when its boring, sex beats, say, reading the paper or cleaning the cat litter. I'm only noting that half hour sex appears to be exactly the sort of sex you and some others said they didn't want last week.
Actually, I don't know what the hell I was saying... But I think I might have made a point. Or maybe not.
"It was the best of times, it was the 'blurst' of times?! Idiot monkeys!"
|
No. I was saying that three 10-min stints are essentially the same as one 30-min stint. Personally, I would prefer three 10-min stints with little breaks in between.
One 10-min stint can be kind of annoying.
In any event, YOU are not permitted to be confounded by inconsistency. Inconsistency is the basis of your entire persona.
