LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 164
0 members and 164 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-20-2005, 07:16 PM   #756
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
bin Laden

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
See, and you claim that i misconstrued your attack as ad hominem. I wonder why. Go back to my original post. Other than calling Goss crazy, I speculated as to motivations, and suggested they were lacking. Of course, I offered up the possiblity I was missing something. Oddly, penske, but not you, responded substantively to that inquiry, to which I responded.

Maybe I'm right; maybe I'm wrong, but why are you riding my jock as opposed to saying "it's all a plan; don't question the plan, because it's a good plan"?

Frankly, the way this admin. has conducted foreign policy (putting aside that the CIA seems to be conducting it, if the reasons Goss offers are to be believed), is particularly worthy of inquiry, regardless of how minimal the explanations they give are.

Actually on my first post about this I quoted you because you were making sense when you said "or are we not getting told everything?". It was your second post when you misquoted me that I attacked you. Anyway, you will be given no quarter today because on Saturday night at a poker game I got gang raped by a bunch of the posters to this board. Although you and the Sgt. Club were not there I am pretty sure you both were part of the conspiracy. Therefore, I am going to assume, that any comments made by members of the conspiracy are in furtherance of said conspiracy, and therefore, are intrinsically flawed.
Spanky is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:30 PM.