LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 229
0 members and 229 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-12-2005, 02:33 PM   #3490
nononono
I am beyond a rank!
 
nononono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In that cafe crowded with fools
Posts: 1,466
Das anti-Kapitalists!

Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
Your drug analogy is not apropos. Those limits are requiring people to abstain from behavior that may harm them, not requiring people to continue a situation that may harm them. I don't think one can know ahead of time in all cases whether there are going to be complications late in a pregnancy, so considering only the known risks is not really completely on point either.

If the mother truly does not want a child, then the mother's relationship to the fetus/potential child is not that different from bilmore's relationship to Not Bob, it seems to me. How is it different? Merely asserting that there is a difference does not advance your argument.
1. That is why I think it is useful to separate situations.

2. A parent's relationship to a child doesn't arise solely (or maybe not much at all) as a result of "want."
__________________
Why was I born with such contemporaries?
nononono is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 PM.