Forums

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Slavery doesn't work for exactly the reason I cited (and you still can't refute) 20 posts ago. You think that because my point is back a few pages, its forgotten, and now you can rehash an argument previously eviscerated. You get cheaper and less creative by the moment. Face it. Not Bob is making you look like I looked the other day when I argued pensions with Ltl. Sometimes, asshot, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about, and your analogy is a piece of shit, logically, morally, ethically and common sensically. This. is. One. Of. Those. Times.

You believe a woman's rights are subordinated to a fetus the moment she's impregnanted. Stop trying to nance around that position with the slavery dodge. It only further exposes you as the disingenuous cur you are on this issue. Just say it. Breathe, now repeat - "I, Bilmore, believe a woman's right to control her body is subordinate to the rights of the fetus she's carrying."

How many times do I have to make that honest argument for you? Why won't you just write it?

I know why... Its pretty noxious and sexist, ain't it. Yeh, when you can't hide behind those semantic dodges and shitty analogies, your policies look pretty regressive and disturbing, don't they?

It's not a question of subordinate, what if they are equivalent?