LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 188
0 members and 188 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-18-2005, 02:25 PM   #1520
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Not Bob & Friends

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I didn't see it, but it seems to me that a runner going from first to second is permitted to interfere with the fielder in a way that a runner going from home to first is not. That said, I don't know the rules, and what you describe sounds sketchy.

eta: Shoulda stp'd -- never mind.
I think that's just not correct. There are certain things a runner can do and have it not be interference, such as slide hard to break up a double play; it just happens that more of them happen while on the basepaths.

I didn't see the play, but it sounds like interference and the umps blew the call. Of course, bear in mind that the umps initially blew the call on A-Rod and called no interference. It was only because it mattered, with Jeter scoring, that they were forced to think about it at the time. Not justifying it; just saying it was more obviously important.

As for A-rod in the ALCS, I never saw it as that big a deal. The umps got the call right in the end, so fine. I think he could have been called out simply for going out of the restraining box, but I don't have a replay handy.

All that said, if either of those plays is interference, why is it not interference when a player runs over a catcher?
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:04 AM.