Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Actually, this all started [again] when the Dems started calling for Rove's head, over a non-leak.
|
It's looking more and more like a leak from all sources except Rove's lawyer.
Quote:
|
Exactly. Ignore the reasons why Plame came up in the first place (nepotism).
|
CIA denies Plame had anything to do with Wilson's selection. What's your source?
Quote:
|
If that's all he did (call attention to scaremongering), I wouldn't have much of a problem. Recall that he was calling for Rove to frogmarched out of DC in cuffs a long, long time ago.
|
You'd be pissed, too
Quote:
I'm not ducking anything. It's a simple answer.
In June and July on 2003, before his NYT signed op-ed and during the time he was talking to Kristof, Wilson was going around to anyone and everyone in DC that would listen that (i) contrary to his original report, there were no Niger-Iraq meetings and (ii) that documents were forged, even though he hadn't seen them.
Why would a Gore supporter and husband of a CIA worker (who- even before his trip deemed the Niger connection as "crazy" ) make such statements? The only justifiable answer is "partisan hack"
|
Wilson consulted for W's first campaign, also. Interesting that the only evidence of partisanship listed on the GOP talking points were comments made after Rove outed his wife. And maybe he called the Niger allegations "crazy" is because they were, in fact, "crazy." Too bad W has such disregard for the truth that he made "crazy" allegations in his SOTU address.
