LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 238
0 members and 238 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-25-2005, 12:51 PM   #4965
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
FactCheck.org

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Others looked at Iraq and saw a problem that could be addressed with containment and inspections. Bush was not content with this, and decided to invade. So far, it looks like a lousy choice. (Sure, Hussein was a bad man, but we haven't exactly installed a form of government preventing another bad man from taking power.) And to get people behind his choice, Bush was, at the very least, reckless and careless with the case he made for war. Since enough Americans have seen The Princess Bride to know that a land war in Asia is a dicey thing, Bush had to persuade people that Iraq was a threat to us. We now know it wasn't.
He was a threat. That's why the UN had sanctions.

How were we containing them? Wasn't there a need for 200K troops on the border for him to let inspectors in?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 PM.