Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
He is talking out of both sides of his mouth. I have no doubt.......but.....the story suggest boguousity.
Take a position. Take some fucking personal responsibility.
"yes, obviously they did it. Obviously it was wrong. It diminishes the process and our is shameful"
Why can't there be some moral clarity. "Perjury is wrong" NOT "Perjury is wrong but it was about sex"
When I worked for Dole in 1988, in NH, someone/persons cut the phone lines to Roberston's campaign headquarters during a crucial pre-primary period.
It was "common knowledge" amongst the political campaign workers that the deed was done by people who worked for a certain Vice President's campaign.
It was wrong. Period. Wrong. It should not have been tolerated. Atwater was a dirty nasty shit.
No qualification there. It is wrong. No excuse.
Someone here asked me the other day, what about when Eisenhower sold out the Brits and French in the Sinai in 56. I replied I disagree (in hindsight, as I am not that old (hi Bilmore!)).
No qualification. Big fuckup. Eisenhower blew it and he is in part responsible for the continued mess in that area and his successors should apologize to the Israelis for his fuck up.
No qualification. But the dems can't do it. They are the party of no reponsibility. There is no right and no wrong, only moral relativity.
|
Nice. Follow this, if you would, with a dissertation defending the W Administration on their postwar plans and execution in Iraq. Remember, no qualification. Thank you.
