LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 219
0 members and 219 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 08-25-2005, 04:05 PM   #2676
paigowprincess
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Six Feet Under

Quote:
Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
I didn't have a problem with that. She realised that Nate would have loved their child regardless. In fact, the whole "this kid sucks" Nate was really only just in her head.

eta: rp said it better than I did. No one is surprised by this.

The damaged, unfixable kid thing was a metaphor for Brenda beung damaged and unfixable and had nothing to do with the kid. I read it that Nate would have gone back to Brenda, and Brenda would have been accepted into the family (hence, the Nathaniel visit, on top of the David saying they are family and Ruth offering to help) had he lived. And this enabled her to be successsful and remarry happily and all that shit.
 
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 PM.