Quote:
Originally posted by mmm3587
Isn't this your schtick? Saying that I can't talk about how bad it is, because the problem is still there even if I talk about it, so I must not be using all my resources to fix it because I'm busy talking. You don't have any idea what I'm doing outside of the time I've spent fucking around on message boards.
I'm not criticizing what other people are doing, or if they're not talking about what they are doing, unless they are talking about helping fucking animals. I love animals. I have several. But the idea of "helping" in a natural disaster by donating money, time or resources to help displaced animals seems absurd to me.
I shouldn't criticize the charity of others. I appreciate whatever people do, and helping displaced animals is better than doing nothing at all. It just strikes me as hopelessly misguided and contrary to my personal morality. Given the person in question's previous comments, I think it's very illustrative.
|
It isn't schtick. I personally find it terrible that people do so little to help kids have a chance at a better life. Doing something more than writing a check. Maybe you do something in that regard. If you do you are about 1 in 1000. I bet not, because if you were that 1 in 1000 you would realize that criticizing others doesn't help. That is, if you aren't putting time into kids in need you really shouldn't criticize other (including society in general), and I just think those that are quick to criticize aren't helping, because if they were helping they would realize how few people help and how futile criticism is. Sore topic, and I'm off my soapbox- oh, and I think you went down the road before anyone posted about saving dogs.
