Quote:
Originally posted by notcasesensitive
the local government responsibility part was in my first post (and before you posted this response I had edited it back in to my attempted repost). I'm not going to debate you here on the points you raised about local government response. That belongs on PB if at all. And I don't think anyone, Ty included, is seriously debating whether there is responsibility to go around here. I am saying that the manner in which you post things directly detracts from people's willingness to read your content. I am not the first person to point this out to you. or even the first person today to point this out to you.
as to your blame Bush crap, need I remind you of your 10 to 15 thousand anti-Clinton posts? You are such a fucking hypocrite. It almost makes the effort of asking an admin to put you on ignore for me seem worthwhile.
Hopefully at some point you will start being amusing to me again. But that point will definitely not be today.
|
I don't want to debate the merits of the issues here either, and I tried not to do that but rather talk in general terms. In general terms I have said there is blame to go around but I think the discussion from certain parts of the spectrum tends to be conclusory and one sided in its criticism of one level of government. I stand by that. if the longer posts with facts, cites to School Board minute meetings on the issue, cites to state evacuation plans bother you, I don't know what to say. Its factual evidence of what went on. It should be looked at and discussed before reaching a conclusion to the contrary.
As for the Clinton charge, you can believe this or not, I was never really that anti-Clinton (in Spanky's analysis I voted for him, twice) until certain parts of the spectrum lost all ability to be objective. I have never seen someone from the opposite side of me, including lawyers, be able to say perjury in front of a federal judge is wrong without qualifying it with an exception that doesn't exist in any statute-and you want to say I am a hypocrite? If one side refuses to be objective why should the other?
