Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
I don't want to debate the merits of the issues here either, and I tried not to do that but rather talk in general terms. In general terms I have said there is blame to go around but I think the discussion from certain parts of the spectrum tends to be conclusory and one sided in its criticism of one level of government. I stand by that. if the longer posts with facts, cites to School Board minute meetings on the issue, cites to state evacuation plans bother you, I don't know what to say. Its factual evidence of what went on. It should be looked at and discussed before reaching a conclusion to the contrary.
As for the Clinton charge, you can believe this or not, I was never really that anti-Clinton (in Spanky's analysis I voted for him, twice) until certain parts of the spectrum lost all ability to be objective. I have never seen someone from the opposite side of me, including lawyers, be able to say perjury in front of a federal judge is wrong without qualifying it with an exception that doesn't exist in any statute-and you want to say I am a hypocrite? If one side refuses to be objective why should the other?
|
care to count how many posts I have made about Bush on PB or otherwise? I am actually anti- most politicians, either side of the fence. Go ahead and find and point to a bunch of my rhetoric-filled politics posts.
Hell, I probably have about 100 posts there total. I like to read what people post there when they are posting actual content, but have little to no desire to enter into pissing matches over politics with anyone there. I even stood up for you and Hank as recently as yesterday, if you recall.
Anyway, I am not at work and engaging in this discussion with you any longer would be counter to my Thursday evening enjoyment, so instead I'm going to head off into the sunshine and maybe run across the street to shop and/or drink.
Toodles!
