LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 164
0 members and 164 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 09-14-2005, 06:16 PM   #24
Captain
Sir!
 
Captain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pulps
Posts: 413
Exclusionary Rule

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
i suspect that Rehnquist would not have flinched to get rid of the exlusionary rule, on the basis that an action in tort would sound, even if sovereign immunity could be invoked.
And, of course, the family of the deceased can always seek an injunction to prevent the government from killing their beloved again.

There may come a time when a majority of the Supreme Court are willing to let the 4th and 5th amendments become dead letters, much as the 9th has become.
Captain is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:59 PM.